(Answered) Directions: There is so much information and misinformation on the web about health, nutrition, and fitness. When looking at resources, it is important to evaluate the credibility of a resource in ord

0
(0)

Directions: There is so much information and misinformation on the web about health, nutrition, and fitness. When looking at resources, it is important to evaluate the credibility of a resource in order to determine the reliability of the information presented.

Review the document Evaluating Online Resources.  Then do an online search using the words “diet” and/or “nutrition”.  You can use www.google.com to do the search, or any other search engine of your choice.  From the results of your search, choose three websites that you would like to evaluate.  For each of the websites, answer the questions below and write a final recommendation on the website’s credibility.

Website #1:

1. What is the URL (http:// address) of the website? (1 pt)

2.  As far as you can tell, what company or organization does the website belong to (i.e. WebMD, MSNBC, Juice Diet, Inc., US Department of Agriculture, etc). (1 pt)

3. What is the extension on the web address (i.e. org, gov, com, etc)? (1 pt)

4.  Is the site promoting a specific product or just supplying information? (1 pt)

5.  Briefly review the information on the website.  Does the information seem inline with the information you learned in Section 4.1 on nutrition?  Explain. (1 pt)

6.  As far as you can tell, is the information based on scientific facts and from credible resources?  (1 pt)

7.  In terms of credibility, would you rate this website as “very credible”, “moderately credible”, or “probably not very credible”? Explain your reasoning. (2 pts)

Website #2:

1. What is the URL (http:// address) of the website? (1 pt)

2.  As far as you can tell, what company or organization does the website belong to (i.e. WebMD, MSNBC, Juice Diet, Inc., US Department of Agriculture, etc). (1 pt)

3. What is the extension on the web address (i.e. org, gov, com, etc)? (1 pt)

4.  Is the site promoting a specific product or just supplying information? (1 pt)

5.  Briefly review the information on the website.  Does the information seem inline with the information you learned in Section 4.1 on nutrition?  Explain. (1 pt)

6.  As far as you can tell, is the information based on scientific facts and from credible resources?  (1 pt)

7.  In terms of credibility, would you rate this website as “very credible”, “moderately credible”, or “probably not very credible”? Explain your reasoning. (2 pts)

Website #3:

1. What is the URL (http:// address) of the website? (1 pt)

2.  As far as you can tell, what company or organization does the website belong to (i.e. WebMD, MSNBC, Juice Diet, Inc., US Department of Agriculture, etc). (1 pt)

3. What is the extension on the web address (i.e. org, gov, com, etc)? (1 pt)

4.  Is the site promoting a specific product or just supplying information? (1 pt)

5.  Briefly review the information on the website.  Does the information seem inline with the information you learned in Section 4.1 on nutrition?  Explain. (1 pt)

6.  As far as you can tell, is the information based on scientific facts and from credible resources?  (1 pt)

7.  In terms of credibility, would you rate this website as “very credible”, “moderately credible”, or “probably not very credible”? Explain your reasoning. (2 pts)

Final Recommendations: Of the websites you reviewed, which sites would you deem as credible and which did you think were less than credible? (1 pt)

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction:
As a medical professor, it is crucial for me to ensure that my students are equipped with the skills to evaluate the credibility of online resources related to health, nutrition, and fitness. In this assignment, I asked my students to conduct an online search using the keywords “diet” and/or “nutrition” and choose three websites to evaluate for their credibility. In this document, I will provide answers to the questions posed in the assignment for each of the three websites chosen.

Website #1:

1. What is the URL (http:// address) of the website?

2. As far as you can tell, what company or organization does the website belong to (i.e. WebMD, MSNBC, Juice Diet, Inc., US Department of Agriculture, etc).
The website belongs to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).

3. What is the extension on the web address (i.e. org, gov, com, etc)?
The extension on the web address is “.gov”.

4. Is the site promoting a specific product or just supplying information?
The site is supplying information and resources related to nutrition.

5. Briefly review the information on the website. Does the information seem inline with the information you learned in Section 4.1 on nutrition? Explain.
The information on the website is comprehensive and covers a wide range of topics related to nutrition. The information is in line with the information learned in section 4.1 on nutrition.

6. As far as you can tell, is the information based on scientific facts and from credible resources?
The information on the website is based on scientific facts and from credible resources, such as the USDA and the National Institutes of Health.

7. In terms of credibility, would you rate this website as “very credible”, “moderately credible”, or “probably not very credible”? Explain your reasoning.
I would rate this website as “very credible” as it is maintained by a government agency with a mandate to provide accurate and reliable information related to nutrition.

Website #2:

1. What is the URL (http:// address) of the website?

2. As far as you can tell, what company or organization does the website belong to (i.e. WebMD, MSNBC, Juice Diet, Inc., US Department of Agriculture, etc).
The website belongs to WebMD.

3. What is the extension on the web address (i.e. org, gov, com, etc)?
The extension on the web address is “.com”.

4. Is the site promoting a specific product or just supplying information?
The site is primarily supplying information and resources related to diet and nutrition, but it also has advertisements for various products.

5. Briefly review the information on the website. Does the information seem inline with the information you learned in Section 4.1 on nutrition? Explain.
The information on the website is comprehensive and covers a wide range of topics related to nutrition. The information is generally in line with the information learned in section 4.1 on nutrition, but there are some areas where the information is not as scientifically rigorous.

6. As far as you can tell, is the information based on scientific facts and from credible resources?
The information on the website is based on scientific facts and from credible resources, such as the American Heart Association and Mayo Clinic.

7. In terms of credibility, would you rate this website as “very credible”, “moderately credible”, or “probably not very credible”? Explain your reasoning.
I would rate this website as “moderately credible” as it is maintained by a reputable health website, but the presence of advertisements for various products raises some concerns about the impartiality of the information provided.

Website #3:

1. What is the URL (http:// address) of the website?

2. As far as you can tell, what company or organization does the website belong to (i.e. WebMD, MSNBC, Juice Diet, Inc., US Department of Agriculture, etc).
The website belongs to Juice Diet, Inc.

3. What is the extension on the web address (i.e. org, gov, com, etc)?
The extension on the web address is “.com”.

4. Is the site promoting a specific product or just supplying information?
The site is promoting a specific product, i.e., the juice diet.

5. Briefly review the information on the website. Does the information seem inline with the information you learned in Section 4.1 on nutrition? Explain.
The information on the website is primarily focused on promoting the juice diet and its benefits. The information is not in line with the information learned in section 4.1 on nutrition, as the juice diet is not a scientifically proven or widely accepted dietary regimen.

6. As far as you can tell, is the information based on scientific facts and from credible resources?
The information on the website is not based on scientific facts or from credible resources.

7. In terms of credibility, would you rate this website as “very credible”, “moderately credible”, or “probably not very credible”? Explain your reasoning.
I would rate this website as “probably not very credible” as it is primarily focused on promoting a specific product and the information presented is not based on scientific facts or credible resources.

Final Recommendations:
Based on my evaluation of the three websites, I would deem the USDA’s nutrition.gov website and WebMD’s diet and nutrition section to be credible sources of information, whereas juicediet.com is not a credible source of information. It is important for individuals to evaluate the credibility of online resources and to rely on scientifically supported information when making decisions related to health and nutrition.

#Directions #information #misinformation #web #health #nutrition #fitness #resources #important #evaluate #credibility #resource #ord

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

(Answered) Task 2: Argumentative Research Paper- Organic foods verses GMOs

0 (0) Writing a research paper gives you an opportunity to explore a topic of special interest, research that topic, and organize your research findings in writing for an academic audience.   Through your preparation work, you have established an argumentative thesis statement and have planned a clear organization of

(Answered) M3A1: Citizens United

0 (0) (copy and paste the link) Review Campaign Finance: Abuses and Reforms. [Video File] [48 min 25 sec] before you participate in this activity. Parts of the video will discuss aspects of campaign finance and reform. Before engaging in this activity, please return to the first discussion topic on

(Answered) The decision in Williams v Roffey Bros signals that the courts in deciding whether or not to enforce a promise, may be guided less by technical questions of consideration than by questions of fairness, reasonableness and commercial utility.

0 (0) The decision in Williams v Roffey Bros signals that the courts in deciding whether or not to enforce a promise, may be guided less by technical questions of consideration than by questions of fairness, reasonableness and commercial utility.   The assignment will be in accordance with the following

(Answered) What are the effects of Ketamine treatment on treatment resistant depression?

0 (0) • Introductory statement clearly describes the phenomenon and main health issue • Clearly identifies the problem and gives an argument for examining the problem • Thesis statement is clear and well-articulated • Clearly articulates the particular population with clinical setting provided 1. Operational Definitions • Operational definitions of

(Answered) Management and Organizational Behavior.

0 (0) Description Exercise 17: Read Annual Pay Raises (W-68-69). This is located in the color-coded workbook section in the back of your book. ( Uhl-Bien, M., Osborn, R. N., & Schermerhorn, J. R. (2014).) Organizational Behavior. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. ISBN:9781118517376 Review the exercise and complete steps 1 and 2.

(Answered) The Wall of Silence Reflective Journal

0 (0)  Assignment Instructions: For this course, you will be reading The Wall of Silence by Gibson and Singh (2003). Please read the book and reflect upon what you have read, and complete the assignment as described. The purpose of this reflective assignment is to provide the approach for connecting

(Answered) HEPATITIS C USING APRI SCORE

0 (0) Determination of Human Subjects Research Form and my project proposal. please, research about IRB. write the Description. Referencing the Determination Checklist on Page 2, briefly describe project objectives, the subject population and types of data/specimens to be collected and analyzed, how the data/specimens will be obtained, and why

(Answered) Company Description and SWOT

0 (0) Non Alcoholic Beverage company!!!! n this assignment, you will conduct a SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, and Threat) analysis for the type of beverage you have selected, and for your company overall. As you work on the assignment, consider why you have chosen one type of non-alcoholic beverage over

(Answered) Oral Language chart of phone conversation

0 (0) Instructions In an APA formatted paper, paste the template found in doc. sharing. Define each of the terms and then watch the video of two children talking on the phone. Rate the language development of one of the two children in the video found at Use the SOLOM.

(Answered) Motivations of Private-Sector Organizations

0 (0)  Presidential Policy Directive 8 (PPD-8) is part of the national preparedness goal and provides a description for preparing for the threats in an all-hazards approach that pose the greatest risk to the United States. Community preparedness is a shared responsibility of the whole community. In addition to the

(Answered) Effective Resource Allocation

0 (0)  The discussion assignment for this week includes a review of the Key Assignment Outline completed by one of your classmates, as well as a substantial response to at least one other student. Primary Task Response: Your first task is to post your own Key Assignment Outline to the

(Answered) Ethics Case Study

0 (0) A student’s analysis of the ethic case must use the following written structural framework, which can be written as a memorandum to the file. Without the bullet points – these indicate required headings for each of the four sections. The following the description heading below to form a

(Answered) The Relativist Ethical Position.

0 (0)  In your post, address the following: To what extent would you agree with the view that research should rely on a relativist ethical position—rules or duties may vary across different communities and professional groups? What examples could you suggest to support this view? References: – Doing Research in

(Answered) Poverty in the classroom

0 (0) A four-unit research paper in APA formatting centered around the effects of poverty in education. The first unit needs to be about the effects poverty has on students in the classroom and needs to be 8-10 pages. Second unit is on the effects of substance abuse on students

(Answered) Causes of America’s War in Vietnam

0 (0) Description Formatting 12 font or smaller, standard script (e.g. Calibri, New Times Roman), 1.00-1.25 margins maximum, double spaced, clean appearance, etc. Basic organization is simple— don’t make it difficult Title— choose one that reflects your views on the topic to inform and engage your reader from the start,

(Answered) Workflows in telemetry

0 (0) Workflow analysis aims to determine workflow patterns that maximize the effective use of resources and minimize activities that do not add value. There are a variety of tools that can be used to analyze the workflow of processes and clarify potential avenues for eliminating waste. Flowcharts are a

(Answered) Critical Decision Making for Providers

0 (0) View the scenario called “Critical Decision Making for Providers”. In a 750-1,200 word paper, describe the scenario involving Mike, the lab technician, and answer the following questions: What were the consequences of a failure to report? What impact did his decision have on patient safety, on the risk