This week, you will compare the strategies identified in Week 4 with evidence-based practices and evaluate a working group for the implementation of your proposed strategies. You will also create a master plan for addressing your health issue based on the individual project components you completed throughout this course.
In Week 1, you selected and analyzed a health issue, explaining the populations or groups most affected by it. In Week 2, you examined the behavioral and environmental risk factors related to your selected health issue. In Week 3, you analyzed the predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling behavioral risk factors for the selected health issue. In Week 4, you identified strategies to address each of these three behavioral risk factors as well as assessed the capacity of the community and community resources for change. This week, the focus of your final project will be to compare these strategies with evidence-based practices and evaluate a working group for the implementation of your proposed strategies. You will also combine the ideas from the papers developed from Week 1 through Week 5 to create a plan that could have a significant impact on the health issue you have selected.
Week 5 Part 1: Attached as Plan to Address Health Issue
Week 5 Part 2:
Compile all the final project components completed from Week 1 through Week 5 in a single 20–page paper (double spaced).
Complete the following:
- Write a 1–2-page executive summary of the program plan. The executive summary should be written keeping a lay audience in mind.
- Create one or more graphic organizers for the planning model, following the framework of the PRECEDE-PROCEED model.
- Review the material and make necessary edits to improve flow of thought and clarity. Use headings and subheadings to organize the various sections of the paper. Be sure to conduct a grammar and spelling check.
- Write an introduction, a summary, and include a separate title page and a page for references.
- Employ a minimum of six scholarly articles to support your assertions.
Use APA formatting for references, headings, and pagination. Cite all sources using the APA format.
Expert Solution Preview
Introduction:
The final project for this course requires students to compile all the final project components completed from Week 1 through Week 5 into a single 20-page paper. The paper should include an executive summary, one or more graphic organizers for the planning model, review of material, and necessary edits to improve flow of thought and clarity. Students should also write an introduction, a summary, and include a separate title page and a page for references. A minimum of six scholarly articles should be used to support the assertions made in the paper, and APA formatting should be employed for references, headings, and pagination.
Question: What should be included in the executive summary of the program plan?
Answer: The executive summary of the program plan should be written with a lay audience in mind and should provide a brief overview of the health issue that was selected and analyzed in Week 1. It should also summarize the strategies identified in Week 4 for addressing the behavioral risk factors related to the health issue, as well as any community resources that were assessed for change. In addition, the executive summary should briefly describe the planning model that was used and highlight key components of the master plan that was developed. Finally, it should include a statement about the potential impact of the plan on the selected health issue.
Question: What is the purpose of creating one or more graphic organizers for the planning model following the framework of the PRECEDE-PROCEED model?
Answer: The purpose of creating one or more graphic organizers for the planning model following the framework of the PRECEDE-PROCEED model is to provide a visual representation of the planning process and to clearly illustrate the different components of the plan. The PRECEDE-PROCEED model is a widely used planning model for health promotion programs and provides a comprehensive framework for planning and evaluating health programs. By using this model and creating graphic organizers, students can more clearly communicate the planning process and make it easier for others to understand and implement the plan.
Question: How many scholarly articles should be used to support assertions made in the paper?
Answer: A minimum of six scholarly articles should be used to support the assertions made in the paper. It is important to use reputable sources to support the ideas presented in the paper and to show that the proposed strategies are evidence-based. Using scholarly articles also demonstrates to readers that the information presented is backed by research and has been peer-reviewed. It is important to properly cite all sources using the APA format to give credit to the original authors and avoid plagiarism.
#Assignment #ProjectPlan #Address #Health #Issue
