(Answered) Breaching Experiment Paper

0
(0)

 Description The point of this exercise is to breach a norm that is not normally broken. Take a common activity, and alter it slightly. While norms can be individually specific, you must break a social norm, preferably a folkway. This SHOULD NOT include breaking any laws or major mores. In fact, the more common the activity, the better the effect will be upon those observing you. While this exercise is meant to be entertaining as well as educational, students are expected to act in a responsible and mature manner during the course of the assignment. While you may conduct your breach on campus, do not disrupt any classes. The exercise is to be done in groups of 3-4 persons. While one person performs the breach, the others are to observe and record the reactions of others. Do so without affecting the breach or the people you are observing. You need to be removed from the event to some degree. Each person should do the breach exercise at least once, possibly twice, so as to have ample reactions from which to draw for your paper. As for the individual who is engaged in the exercise, remember that you must maintain yourself as though you are doing nothing wrong and that your actions are completely acceptable. Do not inform anyone that this is an experiment. Do not attempt to offer any explanation for your actions. This includes responding politely to those who speak with you, etc. Don’t act crazy!!! As you analyze this experience, it may be helpful to ask yourself the following questions: –Which breach did you conduct? –How did it feel to be the violator? –Who were the other participants? –What were their reactions? When you write the paper, you will be take a position concerning a concept or theory discussed in class or in the readings. Then, using the reactions of others who witnessed your breach, you will support or challenge the concept or theory. You are expected to draw from the readings, lectures, and discussions in your paper. This is a normal academic paper, which includes an intro, body, and conclusion as follows: Introduction Questions to answer include: what are norms? What are they for? What do they give to individuals and to society? What happens when they are breached? Why do people care? Then, give us the purpose of the experiment and of the paper. What you did Please explain the norm that you breached, and show what the typical fulfillment of the norm looks like in our society. Then, briefly summarize the reactions you received (you should not talk about them individually yet—just a brief summary of them all). Interpretation In this section, you will look for patterns of reactions in your experiment, and in your group members.’ How did women tend to respond? Men? Older people? Younger? How did ethnicity or culture seem to affect the reactions of those around you? How did your own characteristics govern how your behavior was received? You will want to look at reactions in the context of socialization, and think of how each group has been socialized to respond to your behavior. Theoretical Analysis You will want to pick two or more theories from our course to explain how and why you performed, and others responded to your breach. This is NOT the time to include as many terms as you can from the course; instead, select two theories, explain how they work in detail, and then apply them to specific examples from your experiment. You can draw on any group member’s experience in writing this part, and show how the theory operates in these experiences. Some good theories to include in this part come from our social psychology chapter, chapter 4. Conclusion So, the big question is….did people notice your breach? Why do even mild modifications of “normal” behavior bother people? You will want to include the “taken for granted view” in your overall analysis of this experience.

#Breaching #Experiment #Paper

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

(Answered) Task 2: Argumentative Research Paper- Organic foods verses GMOs

0 (0) Writing a research paper gives you an opportunity to explore a topic of special interest, research that topic, and organize your research findings in writing for an academic audience.   Through your preparation work, you have established an argumentative thesis statement and have planned a clear organization of

(Answered) M3A1: Citizens United

0 (0) (copy and paste the link) Review Campaign Finance: Abuses and Reforms. [Video File] [48 min 25 sec] before you participate in this activity. Parts of the video will discuss aspects of campaign finance and reform. Before engaging in this activity, please return to the first discussion topic on

(Answered) The decision in Williams v Roffey Bros signals that the courts in deciding whether or not to enforce a promise, may be guided less by technical questions of consideration than by questions of fairness, reasonableness and commercial utility.

0 (0) The decision in Williams v Roffey Bros signals that the courts in deciding whether or not to enforce a promise, may be guided less by technical questions of consideration than by questions of fairness, reasonableness and commercial utility.   The assignment will be in accordance with the following

(Answered) What are the effects of Ketamine treatment on treatment resistant depression?

0 (0) • Introductory statement clearly describes the phenomenon and main health issue • Clearly identifies the problem and gives an argument for examining the problem • Thesis statement is clear and well-articulated • Clearly articulates the particular population with clinical setting provided 1. Operational Definitions • Operational definitions of

(Answered) Management and Organizational Behavior.

0 (0) Description Exercise 17: Read Annual Pay Raises (W-68-69). This is located in the color-coded workbook section in the back of your book. ( Uhl-Bien, M., Osborn, R. N., & Schermerhorn, J. R. (2014).) Organizational Behavior. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. ISBN:9781118517376 Review the exercise and complete steps 1 and 2.

(Answered) The Wall of Silence Reflective Journal

0 (0)  Assignment Instructions: For this course, you will be reading The Wall of Silence by Gibson and Singh (2003). Please read the book and reflect upon what you have read, and complete the assignment as described. The purpose of this reflective assignment is to provide the approach for connecting

(Answered) HEPATITIS C USING APRI SCORE

0 (0) Determination of Human Subjects Research Form and my project proposal. please, research about IRB. write the Description. Referencing the Determination Checklist on Page 2, briefly describe project objectives, the subject population and types of data/specimens to be collected and analyzed, how the data/specimens will be obtained, and why

(Answered) Company Description and SWOT

0 (0) Non Alcoholic Beverage company!!!! n this assignment, you will conduct a SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, and Threat) analysis for the type of beverage you have selected, and for your company overall. As you work on the assignment, consider why you have chosen one type of non-alcoholic beverage over

(Answered) Oral Language chart of phone conversation

0 (0) Instructions In an APA formatted paper, paste the template found in doc. sharing. Define each of the terms and then watch the video of two children talking on the phone. Rate the language development of one of the two children in the video found at Use the SOLOM.

(Answered) Motivations of Private-Sector Organizations

0 (0)  Presidential Policy Directive 8 (PPD-8) is part of the national preparedness goal and provides a description for preparing for the threats in an all-hazards approach that pose the greatest risk to the United States. Community preparedness is a shared responsibility of the whole community. In addition to the

(Answered) Effective Resource Allocation

0 (0)  The discussion assignment for this week includes a review of the Key Assignment Outline completed by one of your classmates, as well as a substantial response to at least one other student. Primary Task Response: Your first task is to post your own Key Assignment Outline to the

(Answered) Ethics Case Study

0 (0) A student’s analysis of the ethic case must use the following written structural framework, which can be written as a memorandum to the file. Without the bullet points – these indicate required headings for each of the four sections. The following the description heading below to form a

(Answered) The Relativist Ethical Position.

0 (0)  In your post, address the following: To what extent would you agree with the view that research should rely on a relativist ethical position—rules or duties may vary across different communities and professional groups? What examples could you suggest to support this view? References: – Doing Research in

(Answered) Poverty in the classroom

0 (0) A four-unit research paper in APA formatting centered around the effects of poverty in education. The first unit needs to be about the effects poverty has on students in the classroom and needs to be 8-10 pages. Second unit is on the effects of substance abuse on students

(Answered) Causes of America’s War in Vietnam

0 (0) Description Formatting 12 font or smaller, standard script (e.g. Calibri, New Times Roman), 1.00-1.25 margins maximum, double spaced, clean appearance, etc. Basic organization is simple— don’t make it difficult Title— choose one that reflects your views on the topic to inform and engage your reader from the start,

(Answered) Workflows in telemetry

0 (0) Workflow analysis aims to determine workflow patterns that maximize the effective use of resources and minimize activities that do not add value. There are a variety of tools that can be used to analyze the workflow of processes and clarify potential avenues for eliminating waste. Flowcharts are a

(Answered) Critical Decision Making for Providers

0 (0) View the scenario called “Critical Decision Making for Providers”. In a 750-1,200 word paper, describe the scenario involving Mike, the lab technician, and answer the following questions: What were the consequences of a failure to report? What impact did his decision have on patient safety, on the risk